The second wave of articles for International Services Week series turns from principle to practice: how leaders are building, governing, and standing behind AI in the work.

Consulting Magazine is the exclusive media partner of International Services Week 2026. Earlier this week we published the first wave of our Services Week series, three leaders on the human value, judgment, and readiness that AI cannot replace. This second wave turns from principle to practice: once a firm commits to leading with judgment, how does it actually build, govern, and stand behind AI in the work? Three more leaders take up that question here.

About International Services Week

Now in its third year, International Services Week (June 22 to 26) is a global movement to celebrate and advance the work that powers the modern economy. This year's theme, "Accelerating with AI. Leading with Judgment," names the moment. AI has stopped sitting beside the work and become part of it. The firms pulling ahead are not the fastest adopters but the ones pairing that speed with the judgment, accountability, and trust clients actually buy.

Why we're supporting it

For more than two decades, Consulting Magazine has championed the people and firms that define professional services. International Services Week serves that same purpose on a global scale: to celebrate the practitioners who power the modern economy, raise the standards of the profession, and strengthen the community that connects it. Whatever the theme in a given year, that mission holds, and it is one worth standing behind.

The ISW article series

This second wave centers on implementation, governance, and accountability. Stephanie Taylor of VFP Consulting argues that AI has to work with the systems a firm already runs on, not bolt on beside them. Kazim Rashid of Clearsulting makes the case that the real frontier is not adoption but accountability, defining which decisions AI can make, which it can recommend, and which stay with a person. And Andy Draper of dForce, writing from the front edge of agentic AI, returns to a first principle: authority can be delegated to software, but responsibility cannot.
Together with the first wave, published earlier this week, these pieces trace one arc: from the human trust at the center of this work, through operational readiness, to the accountable judgment the next era will demand.

___________________________________________________________

Moving Past the Hype: Building AI That Connects with Your Existing Ecosystem

By: Stephanie Taylor, CEO
VFP Consulting

When global teams navigate complex enterprise processes or troubleshoot sudden operational errors, finding the right answer frequently feels like searching for a needle in a digital haystack. This operational friction multiplies for organizations operating across multiple countries and regions. Valuable operational information routinely gets trapped in fragmented silos, scattered across internal Slack channels, buried in shared inboxes, tucked away in Dropbox folders, or housed on external help documentation platforms.

The central dilemma for global firms is maintaining corporate oversight without sacrificing operational speed. Leaders must find a way to drive independent problem-solving while keeping worldwide processes standardized. Achieving true velocity requires moving past high-level hype to focus on the practical deployment of unified data streams.

Through our recent work deploying an artificial intelligence support agent with BTS, the focus was placed entirely on connecting these fragmented data streams into a single, intelligent interface. The objective is to securely unify knowledge across Slack, Dropbox, shared inboxes, and documentation. When an employee asks how a process works or inputs a messy error message, the agent intelligently crawls the entire network to deliver immediate, actionable answers. This workflow translates procedural queries into accurate solutions and drives global self-service.

The critical takeaway for professional services leaders is that artificial intelligence must work with your existing ecosystem, not just in it. Driving independent problem-solving across multiple regions requires localized workflows remaining intact while upholding standardized governance worldwide. By establishing an intelligent interface that securely crawls existing platforms, organizations can eliminate data silos and allow global teams to solve problems independently without disrupting localized operations.

___________________________________________________________

The Next AI Failure Will Be a Decision No One Owns

By: Kazim Rashid, Director and CPA
Clearsulting

Bad outputs are only one kind of AI risk. The bigger risk is unclear ownership.

That is why leaders should stop asking, "Where can we use AI?" and start asking the harder question: "What decision rights are we giving it?"

AI is not just another productivity layer sitting beside the business. In many workflows, it is becoming part of the operating system, and operating systems need clear rules of authority: when can AI act, when it should recommend, when it should only prepare inputs for a human decision.

In practice, that means designing work across three lanes. Autonomous: AI handles high-volume, rules-based tasks where thresholds are clear, controls are monitored, and errors are recoverable. Collaborative: AI takes the first pass, a person refines, challenges, or approves the output. Human-led: AI organizes the evidence, but a person owns materiality judgments, policy interpretation, stakeholder communication, and risk.

Most end-to-end workflows need all three.

We see this clearly in finance transformation. Clearsulting benchmark data shows bottom-quartile organizations automate less than 10% of balance sheet reconciliation activity, while top-quartile organizations exceed 70%. The difference is not that leaders hand everything to technology. They build the operating system around it: standardized processes, governed data, upskilled people, disciplined change management, and clear ownership at every handoff.

That is the real frontier: not AI adoption, but AI accountability. It also changes how consulting value is measured. As AI compresses effort, hours alone become a weaker proxy for impact. The better measures are cycle times, first-pass accuracy, exception quality, control effectiveness, rework avoided, adoption, and confidence in the answer.

AI accelerates execution. Judgment creates trust. The next era belongs to firms that can define the chain of command between the two.

___________________________________________________________

Never Delegate Authority Without Responsibility

By: Andy Draper, CEO
dForce

The industry has already experienced Generative AI and Predictive AI. Both have delivered significant value, but both have also exposed challenges around governance, trust, data quality and accountability.

And now, we enter the era of Agentic AI.

Unlike prior generations of AI, agentic systems do not simply generate content or provide recommendations. They can make decisions, trigger workflows, communicate with other agents and take actions across multiple systems. This is where the conversation becomes far more important.

Throughout my career, one principle has remained constant: 'Never delegate authority without responsibility.'

In any organization, authority, responsibility and accountability must remain aligned. Give someone the authority to act and they must also carry responsibility for the outcome. Separate the two and confusion, risk and poor decision-making inevitably follow. The same principle applies whether the actor is human or digital.

The question every business should now be asking is simple: 'Who has delegated authority to your AI agents, and who remains accountable for their actions?'

Technology vendors are rapidly embedding intelligent capabilities into their platforms. Agents can schedule work, reassign resources, trigger communications, execute business processes and increasingly make recommendations that influence operational and strategic decisions. Yet accountability cannot be delegated to software.

As organizations adopt agentic capabilities, the challenge is not whether the technology works. The challenge is establishing governance frameworks that define where authority begins and ends, when human intervention is required, how decisions are audited, and who ultimately owns the outcome.

Trust will not be created through capability alone. It will be earned through control, transparency, assurance and accountability. Organizations must resist the temptation to focus solely on productivity gains while overlooking the consequences of autonomous action.

The future belongs to organizations that design these principles into their operating model from the outset. Because while AI may accelerate decisions and actions, judgement, responsibility and accountability remain fundamentally human obligations.

___________________________________________________________

AI will keep making more of the calls. The question that decides who leads is not whether the technology works, but who owns the outcome when it does. That is the judgment International Services Week was built to champion, and we are proud to give these voices a platform worthy of the work.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.