NEWS BRIEFINGS
Revel Consulting Sees 3,000 Percent Growth
(August 22, 2008) - Bellevue, WA
Former Huron Employee Files Complaint over CEO's Donation Requests
(August 8, 2008) - Chicago, IL
Hewitt Names New Co-Presidents
(July 30, 2008) - Lincolnshire, IL
e-newsletter
FEATURED
WHITE PAPER
RANKINGS
INTERVIEWS
MOST EMAILED ARTICLES
DEPARTMENTS
UPCOMING EVENTS
 »  Home  »  Rankings  »  Best Firms to Work For  »  The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
 »  Home  »  Articles  »  Feature  »  The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
Category:   The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
By Inés Peschiera | Published  11/17/2006 | Best Firms to Work For , Feature
 CommentPost Comment  
It appears that these individuals are stuck waiting for that prize, accruing nothing but long hours and disappointment in the meantime. This becomes increasingly difficult to manage, McIntyre explains, when hedge funds and other competitors can offer consultants “the prize without progression,” thus leading consultants to question, “Should I wait to become a partner here or should I go to a hedge fund and make more money right now?” Though, he adds, that “the downside to hedge funds and other competitors is a less stable career path.”
 
Probably as a result of this competition, “If you look at any consulting firm right now, the position highest in demand is that of manager,” says Rohn.
 
In the end, those who stay and make careers in consulting are those not with patience, but with commitment. And it is fitting that “commitment” and not “patience” is an attribute that all recruiters are looking for in the candidates they screen.
 
“Talent,” it seems, can be reduced to at least one definite attribute, after all. But again, consultants, like their firms, must ensure that talent is properly invested — and invested in.
 
 
 
How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
imgRegenerate Image


Add comment
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by John Smith)
    Rating
    I find it inappropriate that Huron Consulting is included in this list. Except for upper management at each office, the vast majority of their workers are temporary hires with no health insurance, low pay, no benefits (unless you include free coffee and federally required breaks as a benefit), and no assurances of long-term work. In fact, workers are asked to work long hours and on weekends and then when the project is over they're booted out the door with a "don't call us, we'll call you" approach. This is a good place to work? Should Huron be sure listed as a top 10 place to work? I don't think so.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by John Smith)
    Rating
    I think it is absurd that Huron Consulting is listed as one of the top 10 places to work. Except for a few upper level management executives at each office, the vast majority of workers are temporary employees with low pay, no health insurance, no benefits (unless you consider free coffee and federally required bathroom breaks a benefit), and no committment to long-term employement. In addition, they ask that you work long hours including weekends but when your project is done, they dismiss you with a "don't call us, we'll call you" attitude. Does that sound like a great place to work? If you are one of the vast majority of workers, probably not.
     
Submit Comment

 CommentPost Comment